蜜臀av性久久久久|国产免费久久精品99|国产99久久久久久免费|成人精品一区二区三区在线|日韩精品一区二区av在线|国产亚洲欧美在线观看四区|色噜噜综合亚洲av中文无码|99久久久国产精品免费播放器

<cite id="ygcks"><center id="ygcks"></center></cite>
  • 
    
  • <rt id="ygcks"></rt>
    <cite id="ygcks"></cite>
  • <li id="ygcks"><source id="ygcks"></source></li> <button id="ygcks"></button>
  • <button id="ygcks"></button>
    <button id="ygcks"><input id="ygcks"></input></button>
    
    
    <abbr id="ygcks"><source id="ygcks"></source></abbr>
    
    

    Australian tax agency to crack down on lawyers protecting tax-evading clients

    Source: Xinhua| 2019-02-13 11:51:11|Editor: Xiang Bo
    Video PlayerClose

    CANBERRA, Feb. 13 (Xinhua) -- Australia's tax collector has announced a crackdown on lawyers who misuse legal privilege to protect their clients.

    In a post on its website, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) said it was preparing to launch "range of (legal) cases in the short to medium term" against offending lawyers who would face a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.

    Under Australian law, courts and law enforcement agencies cannot compel legal practitioners to disclose communications with their clients.

    However, ATO alleges that lawyers are using the power to shield their clients from convictions for tax evasion, protecting thousands of documents sought by the agency.

    "It's just multiple orders of magnitude over what you'd expect for an ordinary privilege claim," Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told News Corp Australia on Wednesday.

    "The thing we have seen hints of, which I hope not to be the case, is the firm helping the client discover its non-tax purpose.

    "The firm says, 'Here's some we prepared earlier which you may find useful', which are then presented to the commissioner as the real justification.

    He said that the ATO would target a small number of legal practitioners at Australia's leading firms.

    The use of privilege has become a major challenge for government agency's to overcome in recent months.

    National Australia Bank (NAB) in August 2018 unsuccessfully claimed privilege over documents related to its fee-for-no-service misconduct that it did not want scrutinized by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Service Industry.

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the nation's corporate regulator, is currently fighting financial services giant AMP in the Federal Court over AMP's refusal to produce its own fee-for-no-service documents, over which it has claimed legal privilege.

    TOP STORIES
    EDITOR’S CHOICE
    MOST VIEWED
    EXPLORE XINHUANET
    010020070750000000000000011100001378181871
    铜梁县| 大理市| 达尔| 大连市| 安宁市| 大石桥市| 南康市| 彭山县| 驻马店市| 许昌县| 佛冈县| 南乐县| 辽宁省| 江口县| 东阿县| 景谷| 西昌市| 浑源县| 康保县| 海城市| 青冈县| 定边县| 连城县| 萨迦县| 尖扎县| 紫金县| 湖州市| 吉林省| 缙云县| 洮南市| 怀柔区| 专栏| 进贤县| 新津县| 蕲春县| 青神县| 彭州市| 大田县| 平果县| 肃北| 乌苏市|